Search for Noah's Ark
Latest Photos Of The REAL Noah's Ark




Much of the credit for obtaining the
Ararat Anomaly photos goes to Porcher Taylor. The 1949 photo above was released
to Mr. Taylor on March, 14, 1995, who requested the DIA photos using the Freedom
of Information Act.
While camping on the Western Plateau in 1989, Bob Garbe and I stood just above
the Ararat Anomaly. Compare our 1989 photo of the Ararat Anomaly area with the
one above. The 1989 photo seems to show the Anomaly covered by a wave of ice,
but notice the ice meltback below the object is much greater in our photo than
in the 1949 photo?
Close-up view of the 1987 Anomaly photo provided by John McIntosh.

Close-up view of the 1949 Ararat Anomaly
Porcher Taylor has written a 15-page summary about the Ararat Anomaly, and has given me permission to publish here on the Web. You can read the Washington Times article below or jump to Porcher Taylor's Ararat Anomaly Summary.
Unfortunately, since the Washington Times article, many other newspapers around the world have picked up the story, only to over-sensationalize it. Here are a few examples: SPY-IN-THE SKY PHOTOS SHOW REMAINS OF THE ARK; CIA no longer keeping Ark dark; Ark Of Noah Visible; etc.
According to press materials supplied by Shamrock
-- The Trinity Corporation, this satellite view shows Noah's Ark jutting out
from the snow on Mt. Ararat. Image Courtesy of Digital Globe
Satellite photos spark
Noah's Ark trek
Explorers believe ship spotted in images
taken amid record heat
|
An Able Explorer |
|
![]() |
|
|
Imaging the entire ice cap on Mt. Ararat and dozens of square miles around the mountain in one easy satellite swath at 1-meter resolution, IKONOS began rewriting the satellite archaeology playbook in October 1999. Until then, no commercial satellite had the camera capability of imaging an exact spot on Mt. Ararat with any appreciable degree of photographic clarity to determine if this Titanic-shaped and -sized “object” might be manmade.
|
|
![]() |
|
| IKONOS’
1999 calibration mission seemed to confirm that the Ararat Anomaly had the
same ship-like features of the “object” in four declassified aerial
photos taken by a U.S. Air Force plane on a low-level reconnaissance
mission on June 17, 1949. The plane was flying parallel to Mt. Ararat at
14,000 feet. In 1995, I successfully solicited the Defense Intelligence
Agency to release these aerial photos to me under the Freedom of
Information Act. This was the first milestone in my satellite archaeology
project, because it was the first time that the intelligence community had
ever officially released any photographs of Mt. Ararat into the public
domain.
|
|
![]() |
|
Auspiciously, the hot weather in summer 2000 peeled back another layer of secrecy covering the “object.” Another thick, straight line running about 400 feet long was evident in the Aug. 5 image. It was “connected to” and ran parallel to an area that I’ll call, for lack of a better word, the “deck” of the “ship-like object.” This time, much more of the “ship” was visible in the sub-surface ice.
|
|
New photo resparks
'Noah's Ark mania'
Digital image of 'Ararat Anomaly' has
researchers taking closer look
Posted: March 10, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
A
new, high-resolution digital image of what has become known as the "Ararat
Anomaly" is reigniting interest in the hunt for Noah's Ark.
The location of the anomaly on the northwest corner of Mt. Ararat in
eastern Turkey has been under investigation from afar by ark hunters for years,
but it has remained unexplored, with the government of Turkey not granting any
scientific expedition permission to explore on site.
But the detail revealed by the new photo from DigitalGlobe's QuickBird
satellite has a man at the helm of the probe excited once again.
"I've got new found optimism ... as far as my continuing push to have
the intelligence community declassify some of the more definitive-type
imagery," Porcher Taylor, an associate professor in paralegal studies at
the University of Richmond, told Space.com.
For more than three decades, Taylor has been a national security analyst,
and has also served as a senior associate for five years at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.
"I'm calling this my satellite archaeology project," Taylor
said.
Space.com reports the project has been combining the photographic
resources of QuickBird with GeoEye's Ikonos spacecraft, Canada's Radarsat 1, as
well as declassified aerial and satellite images snapped by U.S. intelligence
agencies.
While it's quite possible the item of interest could simply be a natural
ridge of rock, snow and ice, Taylor says there's also a chance it could be
something manmade.
"I had no preconceived notions or agendas when I began this in 1993
as to what I was looking for," he said. "I maintain that if it is the
remains of something manmade and potentially nautical, then it's potentially
something of biblical proportions."
The anomaly remains ensconced in glacial ice at an altitude of 15,300
feet, and Taylor says the photos suggest its length-to-width ratio is close to
6:1, as indicated in the Book of Genesis.
The U.S. Air Force took the first photographs of the Mt. Ararat site in
1949. The images allegedly revealed what seemed to be a structure covered by
ice, but were held for years in a confidential file labeled "Ararat
Anomaly."
The new image was actually taken in 2003, but has never been revealed to
the public until now.
Arking up the wrong tree?
Meanwhile, there are others who believe Noah's Ark has already been found,
and tourists
can actually visit it on a mountain next to Ararat.
The late Ron Wyatt, whose Tennessee-based foundation, Wyatt
Archaeological Research, purported the ark is located at Dogubayazit,
Turkey, some 12-15 miles from Ararat, noting Genesis states the ark rested
"upon the mountains of Ararat," not mountain.
Wyatt's website is filled with on-location
photographs and charts promoting its case with physical evidence including radar
scans of bulkheads on the alleged vessel, deck
timber and iron
rivets, large "drogue"
stones which are thought to have acted as types of anchors, and even some
animal hair inside, possibly from a large cat like a lion or tiger.
A flood of doubt
However, there's been no shortage of critics from both scientific and
Christian circles who think the Dogubayazit site is erroneous.
Lorence Collins, a retired geology professor from California State
University, Northridge, joined the late David Fasold, a one-time proponent of
the Wyatt site, in writing a scientific
summary claiming the location is "bogus."
"Evidence from microscopic studies and photo analyses demonstrates
that the supposed Ark near Dogubayazit is a completely natural rock
formation," said the 1996 paper published in the Journal of Geoscience
Education. "It cannot have been Noah's Ark nor even a man-made model. It is
understandable why early investigators falsely identified it."
The Answers in Genesis website provides an in-depth
report attempting to debunk any validity the Dogubayazit site has, and
concludes by stating:
"[A]s Christians we need to always exercise due care when claims are
made, no matter who makes them, and any claims must always be subjected to the
most rigorous scientific scrutiny. If that had happened here, and particularly
if the scientific surveys conducted by highly qualified professionals using
sophisticated instruments had been more widely publicized and their results
taken note of, then these claims would never have received the widespread
credence that they have."
Officials with Wyatt Archaeological Research remain unfazed in the face of
such criticism.
"The site ... is actually something that you can look at. Not some
made up story that no one is quite able to reach but something that is really
there," said president Richard Rives. "It is a 'boat-shaped object'
composed of material containing organic carbon, which is what is found in
petrified wood. ...
"While there is more research that needs to be done at the site,
there is a substantial amount of evidence that would indicate that the Wyatt
site is not a natural object. ...
"Today, everyone wants to tell us how to think. We, at Wyatt
Archaeological Research, do not do that. We just present the evidence that we
have and let each individual make his own decision."
In both the Old and New Testaments, the Bible speaks of Noah and the ark,
and Jesus Christ and the apostles Paul and Peter all make reference to Noah's
flood as an actual historical event.
According to Genesis, Noah was a righteous man who was instructed by God to
construct a large vessel to hold his family and many species of animals, as a
massive deluge was coming to purify the world which had become corrupt.
Genesis
6:5 states: "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the
earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil
continually."
Noah was told by God to take aboard seven pairs of each of the
"clean" animals – that is to say, those permissible to eat – and
two each of the "unclean" variety. (Gen.
7:2)
Though the Bible says it rained for 40 days and 40 nights, it also mentions
"the waters prevailed upon the earth a hundred and fifty days."
The ark then "rested" upon the mountains of Ararat, but it was
still months before Noah and his family – his wife, his three sons and the
sons' wives – were able to leave the ark and begin replenishing the world.
CIA
releases new 'Noah's Ark' documents
Noah's
Ark? Or elaborate fraud?
Pharaoh's
chariots found in Red Sea?
Real-life
raiders hunt Ark of the Covenant
Christmas
in America becomes battleground A team
of scientists, archaeologists and forensic experts plan to climb Turkey's Mt.
Ararat this summer in quest of evidence that will prove they have discovered
Noah's Ark. Satellite
photos taken last year at the height of a record-warm summer, give Daniel P.
McGivern confidence he has discovered the biblical icon.
"These new photos unequivocally show a man made object," McGivern
told reporters at the National Press Club in Washington.
"I am convinced that the excavation of the object and the results of
tests run on any collected samples will prove that it is Noah's Ark," said
McGivern, president of Shamrock - The Trinity Corporation of Honolulu, Hawaii.
McGivern said his field manager for the excavation will be Dr. Ahmet Ali
Arslan, a native of Turkey who has traveled up Mount Ararat 50 times in 40
years.
Arslan, who formerly worked in the Turkish prime minister's office, plans to
discuss details of the excavation with the prime minister next week, according
to Space.com.
The U.S. Air Force took the first photographs of the Mt. Ararat site in 1949,
Space.com said. The images allegedly revealed what seemed to be a structure
covered by ice, but were held for year in a confidential file labeled
"Ararat Anomaly."
The government released several of the images in 1997, but experts say they
are inconclusive.
McGivern's expedition follows an attempt in 2002 by Porcher Taylor, a senior
associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington,
D.C.
Taylor used satellite imagery of the area, but photos taken in 2003 by
DigitalGlobe's Quick Bird satellite provide a unique view because last summer
was Europe's hottest since 1500.
The journey up Ararat, 17,820 feet, is planned for July 15 to Aug. 15.
The team's goal is to enter the alleged structure, believed to be about 45
feet high, 75 feet wide and as long as 450 feet.
"We are not excavating it. We are not taking any artifacts. We're going
to photograph it and, God willing, you're all going to see it," McGivern
told reporters.
As WorldNetDaily has previously reported, there are many who believe Noah's
Ark has already been found on a site several kilometers from Mt. Ararat, and
say it's faithful to the Bible account which states in Genesis 8:4 the ark
rested "upon the mountains of Ararat," not mountain.
The Turkish government has proclaimed it to be Noah's Ark, and a visitor's
center is open there. CIA
releases new 'Noah's Ark' documents
The CIA has released two new documents that indicate the search for ''Noah's
Ark'' reached the level of the White House, according to a report in Insight
Magazine.
The release of the documents comes two years after Insight published an
exclusive story on the search for the biblical Noah's Ark.
The magazine teamed with Space Imaging to use its IKONOS satellite to zoom in
on an anomaly in Turkey located at 39 degrees 42 minutes north latitude and 44
degrees 16 minutes east longitude.
The result was the public's first glimpse of high-resolution photographs of
what some say is Noah's Ark.
Insight then hired a team of scientists and engineers to examine the photos
of Mount Ararat to determine whether the object in question was man-made or
rock. Four of the experts claim it's man-made, two believe it's rock and one
says the evidence is inconclusive.
The documents recently released by the CIA don't shed any more light on the
mystery but do indicate somewhat the extent to which the U.S. government was
involved in the search.
One of those documents is a 1995 memo from an agent who had a conversation
with John Hanford, who was then a member of Sen. Richard Lugar's, R-Ind., staff.
Hanford spoke of a White House meeting under the George H.W. Bush administration
in which Robert Gates, then national security director, showed off a satellite
photo of the Mount Ararat area.
''Mr. Hanford said the imagery showed something sticking out from the ice and
snow — but that it could have been almost anything,'' said the agent.
The agent wrote the memo after reading a newspaper article that suggested the
Mount Ararat imagery might be made public due to former president Clinton's
decision to release historical documents.
The memo said such imagery ''might or might not be included in the
declassified materials.''
The other document concerns a review of materials about Mount Ararat by the
same administration between 1990 and 1992.
Former CIA director James Woolsey asked what a more exhaustive review of the
materials might cost. The document reveals the price was considered too high,
and Woolsey was told it would take six months to complete the study. The project
apparently never got off the ground.
Insight is still seeking additional records, but most government documents
and imagery associated with Noah's Ark remain classified.
The CIA plans to make thousands of satellite images available on the
Internet, but it's unclear whether they will include photos of Mount Ararat.
The magazine is reviewing its options and considering whether to pursue other
images taken by the CIA with its KH-9 remote-sensing satellite in 1973 and its
KH-11 satellite in 1976, 1990 and 1992.
LATEST NEWS - 14 June 2006 Noah's Ark and Mt Ararat - found not in
Turkey, but in Iran? On June 5th, Bible Historian and explorer Bob
Cornuke led an expedition of 15 geologists, historians, archeologists,
scientists and attorneys on an exhausting mission 13,300 feet above sea
level to locate and document the tremendous sections of what is thought
to be Noah's Ark located in the Ararat mountain range six hours North of
Tehran, Iran. It had been essentially buried beneath the preservation of
glaciers until last year when Iran recorded the hottest year on record
which melted some of the snowcap revealing 450 by 75-foot footprint of
the "object." Noah's Ark was claimed to be found in Northern
Iran rather than Turkey. Over a thousand expeditions had previously
scoured Turkey's Mt. Ararat, but by following the precise language of
the Bible, Cornuke found what is believed to be Noah's Ark, nearly in
tact. Turkey's Mt. Ararat was incorrect because Marco Polo named the
large mountain during his journeys in the 13th century. Through mapping
scriptures in Genesis with ancient maps, Cornuke pieced together the
clues and found where the Ararat Mountain Range made home for Noah's Ark
in Northern Iran not far from Turkey. Bob Cornuke has been at the center
of several controversies over his past findings as he has come at odds
with secular scholars, but several people who I know personally were on
this expedition as well as some credible, internationally known heads of
Christian ministries. Cornuke and the participants are careful to not
say emphatically that they found Noah's Ark, but have taken extensive
documentation to present their facts for both the public, and the
Biblical and scientific communities. 6,300 ft above sea level,
in Mountains of Ararat; near Dogubeyazit, Turkey Compare this
discovery with Above
"Ararat Anomaly" on Mt Ararat is being
investigated
All
archeological evidence supports the biblical account
that a worldwide flood did happen. Countless
fossilized sea creatures have been found on mountain
tops. And countless fossilized creatures
(including dinosaurs) have been found with food in their
mouths --as if they were suddenly buried in an avalanche
of rushing water and mud. Scientists
will not admit it, but their carbon dating technique is
not any good at all beyond a couple of thousands of
years. Because the effect of rushing water, heavy
pressure from water, and resting water -- rocks on this
planet appear to be millions of years old to these
unbelieving scientists and their carbon dating
technique. Things fossilize much quicker than
scientists will tell you. Scientists will have you
believe it takes millions of years to fossilize
something. Yet a fossilized pickle has been found
in a canning jar, and a fossilized foot has been found
inside a 1930's-1940's cowboy boot in a West Texas
riverbed. See here That's not
all. Accounts of the worldwide flood come in from nearly
every culture on earth. Most of these are
identical. Flood accounts come in from Mayan,
Persian, Aztec, Sanskrit, Chinese, Egyptian, Babylonian,
Inca, Samarian, American Indian, Jewish cultures, and
more. The Mayan writings say that water cleansed
the earth in 3113 B.C. 2003
Satellite Image of above anomaly on Ararat "I had no
preconceived notions or agendas when I began this in
1993 as to what I was looking for," he said.
"I maintain that if it is the remains of
something manmade and potentially nautical, then
it's potentially something of biblical
proportions." Ray Anderson just sent me the link to
his brand new site detailing his own search for Noah's Ark on
Mount Ararat. His new site has pictures and sighting reports I
had never before heard of. CIA
releases new 'Noah's Ark' documents
Noah's
Ark? Or elaborate fraud?
Pharaoh's
chariots found in Red Sea?
Real-life
raiders hunt Ark of the Covenant Home/Table of Contents/Mark
of The Beast/The Coming Plagues/ The
Asteroid/Purpose and Intent/Biometrics/Tracking
People/Barcodes/Smart
Cards/What 666 is Not!/ The
Bible Is True Evidence/ Scientology, Evidence
that Supports the Flood/ Search for Noah's
Ark/ Neanderthals/ Our
Sun/ Evolutionary Hoax/ Long
Life/ Planetary Rotation/ Mormonism
/Islam / Is
There Life Out There/ Understanding
Cult Cult Index, Jesus VS Muhammad,
Noah, Who
Was Muhammad, How
Epilepsy Shaped Islam,
Islam Table of Contents,THE
ANTICHRIST AND THE 12TH IMAM OR AL MADHI: ARE THEY THE SAME, Dajjal,

Satellite image of 'Ararat Anomaly,' taken
by DigitalGlobe's QuickBird Satellite in 2003 and now made public for
the first time (courtesy: DigitalGlobe)

Some believe this is Noah's
Ark, already found on a mountain next to Mt. Ararat (courtesy:
wyattmuseum.com)

Is this a hair from a large cat aboard
Noah's Ark? (photo: Richard Rives, wyattmuseum.com)

'Noah's Ark' by Pennsylvania artist Edward
Hicks, 1846
Search
for vessel reached level of White House in early '90s
Editor's note: WorldNetDaily is pleased to have a content-sharing
agreement with Insight magazine, the bold Washington publication not afraid to
ruffle establishment feathers. Subscribe
to Insight at WorldNetDaily's online store and save 71 percent off the cover
price.

Satellite image of object on Mount Ararat
After crawling on hands and knees miles above the earth's surface in
four below zero weather, the expedition found an altar, which could very
well be the altar Noah built because it was made from the same materials
they later found in the Ark. They found grapevines over two inches think
in the area, of which the DNA from the grapes is the oldest known to
man. Genesis 9:20 says that Noah planted a vineyard. But most amazing
was the ark itself. It was found in sections, somewhat like a house that
had collapsed over the years. Sections of petrified wood 12 to 14 feet
high and 40 feet long were found. They found a huge pile of timber,
thought to be floors or walls, in four-to-six foot sections.
Geologists took nine samples of the ark under the strict eye of a video
team for analysis by the Smithsonian Institute. Over 23,000 feet of
video was taken and will be released to the public. You can get your
first glimpse of it on Fox News with John Kasich Saturday at 8:00pm
Eastern time, according to the Cornuke team. The expedition members hope
to spark debate over the Ark; hope to show that the Bible is accurate
and true; and hope that people will come to know Christ through the
truth that they have revealed. In John 8:32, Jesus said, "And you
shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." May you be
revived and energized by the possibility of this wonderful discovery
that there is one God and His truth reigns forever.

(note: Bible deliberately said in the mountains
of Ararat--found 20 mi from Mt Ararat)
Is
this the real Noah's Ark? Why is more of the wood not
fossilized? Because it was covered in pitch? Local
weather conditions? Why didn't Ron Wyatt give pieces of the
wood to others to be tested other than that one lab? Why
didn't the lab report state what kind of wood it was made of?
Was it gopher wood, or not? If not real the real Noah's Ark,
then why is it there?
This was held for years
in a confidential file labeled "Ararat Anomaly."

The
worldwide Flood in the time of Noah is no fable!
According to Scripture, God destroyed the ungodly who
then lived on the earth. It is probable that this
ungodly people included giants who were born from the
unholy union of the descendents of Adam and the fallen
angels. This probably created a gene pool which
resulted in our short live spans, cancer, heart disease,
etc.
taken by DigitalGlobe's QuickBird Satellite in 2003

Located in glacial ice at an
altitude of 15,300 feet in 2003, some scientists say the photo
suggest its length-to-width ratio is close to 6:1, similar to
the description in the Book of Genesis. Same anomaly as
the 1949 image above. Satellite
image of 'Ararat Anomaly,' taken by DigitalGlobe's QuickBird
Satellite in 2003.
The anomaly remains
ensconced in glacial ice at an altitude of 15,300 feet, and
Porcher Taylor a past Washington intelligence analyst says the
photos suggest its length-to-width ratio is close to 6:1, as
indicated in the Book of Genesis.
While it's quite possible the item of interest could
simply be a natural ridge of rock, snow and ice,
Taylor says there's also a chance it could be
something manmade.
18 April 06:
Can it be that God has purposely kept Noah's Ark hidden till
the right time in these "End Days", when all those
who are written in the "Lamb's Book" are
converted by Faith in Jesus, and NOT by an object such as
Noah's Ark?
Read about Ray's fascinating new information on Noah's Ark
here:
http://www.noahsarkfactnotfiction.com/